Hamlet and Lion King Comparison Essay

Still captivating people today, the bosh elements and spotless spell of hamlet, written by the influential William Shakespeare, have make it to the word picture screen in a version that the integral family evict enjoy. The lion female monarch, one of Disneys most leg reverseary videos, illustrates aspects and characteristics of Shakespeares critical point, and captures it in a magical, enthusiastic style. More than just the unforgettable music and remarkable animations, The social lion King follows the popular plot, conflict, climax, and resolution that William Shakespeare scribbled on paper oer four hundred years ago. However, all of Disneys animation movies destruction with a prosperous ending, which means that movie writers of The social lion King had to change the story elements of small town to better suit the movie for young audiences. Disney was overall primarily happy in delivering the dark, complex story plot of small town in The king of beasts King by stil l preserving the optimism and purity of Disney movies, with only a gruelingly a(prenominal) minor flaws.The far-reaching influence Shakespeares settlement had on the movie The lion King is evident finished character comparisons, family conflict, and moral struggle within the characters. Simba, who undergoes his fair share of hardships and worries, can be directly colligate to to crossroads. twain characters suffer the loss of their father and they both seek to be alone, running play onward from their responsibilities in the royal family. To escape the guilt of the death of his father, Simba runs out-of-door from all indebtedness to forget about his past. village too runs away from his responsibility, with the thoughts of penalize and suicide overtaking his mind. Both main characters have to measure their morals as well Hamlet decides whether it is moral or non to seek revenge on this uncle and Simba has to make the imperative decision of whether he should take cont rol of the Pride Lands again. Hamlets father can be directly correlated to Mufasa, Simbas father. Both kings ruled over their kingdom in peace and prosperity, with the intent of good ambitions.Both kings also suffered a tragic death, due to the immorality and cruelty in their brothers. scar and Claudius, characterized as Simba and Hamlets uncles, both used evil convictions to compact their way onto the throne. Sarabi and Gertrude, the queens and mothers in both of the stories, care about their sons precise much. They also have little to no power over their kingdom, difference the uncles in full charge. When Simba returned to Pride Rock to declare his spot on the throne, he was furious when he saw how Scar was treating his mother, just kindred how Hamlet was furious about how Claudius didnt treat his mother as good as his father once did. Nala can be related to the character Ophelia from Hamlet, mainly because Nala is Simbas love interest, as Ophelia is to Hamlet. Disney did a precise good job at preserving the main ideas and character significance of the maestro piece, without taking out anything important.The king of beasts King placed a childrens perspective on a actually gruesome story of responsibility and revenge. Disney was clever in adapting the story plot to a childrens audience. to the highest degree of the differences between the two works are because Disney had to change some of the stories conflicts to memorise moral lessons and have much positive influences on the younger audience. Hamlet was written for an audience that is older and mature, and less vulnerable to the dreadful deaths and upset dialogues that Hamlet delivers. If a child ever saw the sinister plot and conflicts of Hamlet, they would be easily influenced to make bad decisions. The Lion King has a more encouraging, child- peerly essence to it, with positive songs and cheerful secondary characters that help glide by to a happy ending. The Hamlet, however, has a very gloom y and depressing nicety to it, with no foreshadowing of hope in the future. The ending of Hamlet ends in the terrible bloodshed of all the main characters, including Hamlet.If this ending were to happen in The Lion King, it would not be suitable for children and it may even gear up some children into shock. It was a great idea that Disney decided to change the aspects of the story line that may influence child behavior, such as changing the horrible ending to a happy one, making Simba not job suicide deal Hamlet, and presenting the famous Hakuna Matata song, meaning no worries. When Simba ran away, he effect a worry-free and happy life. This was changed from the original Hamlet plot to help children take thatproblems can get better if they stop overthinking and worrying about them. The Hamlet version of this, if shown to little kids, would make them overthink their problems in life to the point of conceive of suicide or seeking vile revenge, just like Hamlet did. Disney did a perfect job at adjusting the story of Hamlet to the captivate audience for The Lion King.There were few minor flaws that Disney made in the remaking of Hamlet in The Lion King. In The Lion King, movie producers left out characters like Laertes and Polonius from Hamlet, and they werent very clear with the characterizations and placing of Horatio, Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern from Hamlet in The Lion King. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern couldve been correlated to Simbas friends Timon and Pumbaa, except for the fact that Simbas friends didnt betray him and spy on him for his uncle. Timon and Pumbaa could also be related to Horatio, but they werent Simbas early childhood friends. The Lion King couldve improved the movie by having Simba have a childhood friend to provide relief to the audience from the main focus of the story, and also by having Simba have two friends that spy on him for Scar to spice up the plot and conflict a bit more. Having characters similar to Laertes and Polonius in The Lion King would also spice up the plot and conflict more as well, because those additional characters would make it harder for Simba to reach his goal in the end it would be worth it and show the audience that no matter how hard something is, they can get through it.The only two obstacles that Simba had to go through were the weak hyenas and his uncle, Scar. Adding more antagonists to the story line would make the plot a little more interesting like Hamlet, considering he went through several(prenominal) obstacles to pursue revenge on his uncle. One other mistake that Disney made on The Lion King was that Simba didnt mourn over the death of his father for a very long time, like Hamlet did. In the Hamlet, the death of his father affected Hamlets mind for the whole stretch of the play. Because of this, readers could tell that Hamlet loved and honored his father very much. Simba, however, forgot about this father and duties as king for many years when he ran away. Disney couldv e showed a better sense of companionship and love for family if they made Simba mourn a little longer over the death of his father.To summarize our Hamlet and Lion King Comparison Essay, Disneys movie, The Lion King, embodied the Shakespearean work of Hamlet in a way that it brought the story of Hamlet back to life, with modern day morals and important life lessons. til now though Hamlet was very evil with its dark schemes and dialogue, it taught the lesson that seeking revenge on someone will get that person nowhere they must step up and be the better person. Simba stated clearly in the fight against his uncle that he wasnt gonna kill his uncle because he wasnt like him. In the end, fate ended up killing his uncle anyway and it wasnt Simbas fault, so the story of The Lion King didnt end in a tragic way. Disney did a wonderful job at modernizing the enduring and classical themes and plot of Hamlet by making The Lion King a family-friendly movie. Throughout the plot, settings, cha racters and lessons, Disney proved to be very victorious in rewriting the tale of Hamlet in the most rose-colored and hopeful way possible, with very few flaws.