Are There Philosophical Reasons To Promote Gifted Education In The Context Of A Democratic And Egal :: Philosophy Essays

Are in that respect Philosophical Reasons To Promote Gifted Education In The Context Of A Democratic And Egalitarian Society?ABSTRACT Despite the historical erudition of the importance of the development of man-to-man benignant potentialities for the group, smart individuals exact non been treated equ completelyy. Three reasons are analyzed (a) the primacy given to institutions over the individual, extract those particular cases in which the individual is identified with the institution itself, or invested with the place of one institution (b) the lack of recognition of the particular needs of gifted individuals and (c) the arrogance of egalitarian ideals inside specific societies. Despite arguments to the contrary, gifted teaching will be defended. Gifted individuals have special needs. I copy that Hope and Good Will provide enough justification for this common human task. Traditionally defined, education is the social enterprise that preserves the heathen gains of hu man groups, and transmits them to future generations. As a social tool, education is apply to reach collective and individual objectives it is a common tool that helps to cope with the needs of both the society as a whole, and each individual in particular. It is also broadly acknowledged that educational endeavors are human efforts to trim, polish, and improve our human nature.From a historical perspective, we notice that human societies have provided unequal educational attention to their constituencies. Individuals coming from different socio-economical strata have had annoy to correspondingly different levels of attention. Usually, those individuals pertaining to a higher strata in the power expression have received the benefits of a major social investment, mainly for the interest of status, regardless of their real capabilities.At this point we need to make intelligible the implicit assumption that individual capabilities --wit, talents, genius, temper, neuromusculoskele tal structure, and diverse chemical byproducts-are the historical expiry of randomly combined factors, including date and place of birth. There is another assumption that should be considered for a mixture of pragmatic and ideological reasons without ignoring that some of its implications start out some internal logical contradictions and, potentially, undesirable effects. Nevertheless, if we assume --for the sake of the argument-- that all human beings are equal, and all have the right to develop their potential to its maximum, then we have to say that fair and systematic attention is not found in the treatment given to the whole class of individuals genetically endowed with special needs --including the gifted ones. Some of them have been omit in the frame of our highly socio-economical and politically stratified societies.