'Lowry’s The Giver\r'

'Character isolationism and the struggles meet solitude argon recurring subjects in umteen an distinct(prenominal)(prenominal) undischarged pieces of literature. Lowry’s The donor is an excellent act of contemporary fiction whose main shell, Jonas, struggles with such a burden. In order to properly identify character relationships of isolation, I will compargon and contrast The conferrer with two separatewise well-known pieces of adolescent literature: The Outsiders by S. E. Hinton and Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger.\r\nJonas, in The Giver, views his hometown as the blameless place, a utopia that is complete and free of ruinous element such as conflict, illness, divorce, and inequality. He comes from a loving, demonstrative family unit: receive, cause, single brother, peerless sister. Every genius in his hometown fits this perfectly balanced poster-family mold. It’s a gift-wrapped location to raise a family, or so we ar take to believe. His fam ily, as atomic number 18 all families in this utopia-like society, has good communication methods and argon supportive of unmatched a nonher.\r\nLowry creates such a land to impact his theme of a wiz teetering into the estate of isolationism. The author uses the omniscient point of view of Jonas end-to-end the flooring. As the reader envisions the story solely with Jonas, we see his family is supposed sh atomic number 18s their feelings and emotions when issues arise. It’s almost alike perfect. and perfection\\ diminishes when we learn, through foreshadowing, that a reliable pilot who was in a plane prostration was to be â€Å"released from the biotic community. ” The de go throughrer’s voice takes the accompaniment lightly, even with a hint of humorâ€a marker that something is amiss.\r\nOne of the main themes in The Giver is individuality verses conformity. This repeats Jonas’s struggles with isolationism. Lowry leads us to believe in this utopia. Yet, as Jonas and other children freely choose jobs to increase their own knowledge base, it becomes app arnt that the ageds digest another purpose for them. The Elder will be choosing what solicitude their future will go once they atomic number 18 twelve years-old. Later, Jonas shares a provocative dream he had about Fiona. Jonas is pleased with the pleasure his dream brings to him.\r\nLowry wrote, And the bleakness, too. It was against the rules for children or adults to look at another’s nakedness; but the rule did not apply to newchildren or the Old. (p. 30) This statement speaks volumes about the sexual racism and tensions that were overabundant in the society of The Giver which abide be compared to the pressures that revolved rough the berth of wealth in The Outsiders and Catcher in the Rye. The Giver’s protagonist accepts this rule as Lowry responds to the rule against seeing other people naked. Jonas was glad.\r\nIt was a nuisance to keep oneself cover while changing for games, and the required apology if one had by mistake glimpsed another’s be was al shipway awkward. (p. 30) The author gives us subtle hints of Jonas’s isolation that is to come. He liked the safety present in this warm and quiet room (p 30) agree to the Elders ‘touching’ other people outside of one’s immediate family was deemed rude and inappropriate behavior. His mother informs him that he’ll be taking a tabloid to stand by him. This is one more way for the Elders to defy their young person. In event, this leads to Jonas into isolationism.\r\nJonas begins to feel sad. When Gabe is actually allowed to live with Jonas’s family, the community sets boundaries. Gabe offer stay but they are not allowed to become emotionally attached to him. The communities’ heart and soul of controlling its people sinks Jonas further into isolation. Jonas speaks with the principal Elder in chapter eight, b ringing to light the impact of his isolation. The Chief Elder says, â€Å"But you will be confront now,” she explained gently, â€Å"with pain of a magnitude that none of us here can comprehend because it’s beyond our project…. So, because the Elders, hid their true motive, children are torn emotionally from what was to be a perfect liveliness. When we consider the story, The Outsiders by S. E. Hinton we find many parallels with The Giver. Both have themes have-to doe with on isolationism and what sort of autograph effects it can have on an individual, a family, or a town. There are besides contrasting differences in these two originals. Both of which will be discussed in detail. The Outsiders is a story of two adolescent gangs: the socs and the greasers. This novel is a classic East versus West scenario in a small Oklahoma town in the 1960’s.\r\nThe soc’sâ€which is an abbreviation for socialsâ€is a gang of moneyed teenage hoodlums t hat drive fast cars, get the fairly girls, and have the social markings of velocity class out-of-pocket to their family’s economic status. The greasers are the gang of teenage boys that come from the lower class, most being increase in broken homes where mom or dadaismâ€or sometimes neither parentâ€is around to provide guidance. One contrasting difference here is the particular that The Giver opens with families living in a utopia-like geographic area where every single family fits the perfect family unit of a father, mother, and two siblings.\r\nThis family unit is structure with communication skills as well where issues are discussed on a daily basis. There are no racial tension or inequality issues to speak of in The Giver, either. S. E. Hinton, on the other hand, creates a real-life scenario that parallel’s lifestyles in Oklahoma in the 1960’sâ€which is when the book was written by an actual teenager. Thus, The Outsiders displays how nonadapt ive families operate. There is constant conflict among siblings and taunting amid the greasers and the socs. Being in a gang forthwith offers the teenage-societies an extended family.\r\nThey trust one another and transgress die for each other. The families within the gang actualise one another because they can relate to one another’s pain and suffering. Even when they are faced with such constant emotional struggles, carnal entanglements, and trouble with law enforcement, the gang members are on the same wave-length and follow one another. In The Giver, the families live in an observable pristine environment that straightway opposes this. The parents and children form proper communication channels by discussing issues at dinnertime.\r\nSome of the characters in the Outsiders are well-situated if they get dinner every night. Yet, the path of isolationism for Jonas is the multiplication for the character’s circumstances. He cannot free himself of this down(pre nominal) spiral, even when he’s placed in such a positive environment. S. E. Hinton, on the other hand, displays characters coming together in the worst of times. some other parallel, in The Outsiders, ties into the issue of separation from family. Here, teens are lots led to see things as besides expert or wrong. But, as we know, circumstances in life are rarely black and white.\r\nToo many intricacies are involved when teens are struggling to stomach and discover their way to be viewed as patently all-right or all-wrong. The protagonists in both Hinton’s and Lowry’s novel have underlying subplots of youths nerve-racking to discover their place in life. Another comparison is the fact that both authors play into the common-knowledge ideal that says, life isn’t fair. Whether life is fair to the soc’s or the greasers is seen differently. The soc’s desire the glamour and status that goes along with their soaked upbringing.\r\nThe grease rs, on the other hand, desire a different image. They don’t want to be associated with the upper crust of society. According to a greaser, the money, clothes, and cars, are the nett thing they’d ever view as a priority in life. In fact, they abominate them, mainly for how society treats the lower class. However, both gangs are products of a lifestyle where parental upbringing doesn’t show respect to their children because parents are unwilling to beware to the youth’s ideas, desires, and needs. These are the precise components that led to Jonas’s separation from the family unit.\r\nIn the novel, Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger, we find similar connections in the background of each story. Both novels depict a protagonist coming from an affluent upbringing. Salinger’s novel is set in a post domain of a function War II time when the nation was trying to make a financial recovery. Holden goes to a common soldier school and money is of no concern to him, his family, or his immediate peer group. The breadwinner in Catcher in the Rye, Holden’s father, is a corporate attorney that is only interested in money, golf, and fancy toys such as classy cars.\r\nFreedom from financial concerns is a comparative attribute for Holden and Jonas. Holden and his father don’t look one another which can be compared to Jonas and a discussion he has with the Elders in Chapter 20. â€Å"What about you? Do you lie to me, too? ” Jonas almost spat the head at The Giver. â€Å"I am empowered to lie. ” This grave scene in The Giver brings to light how tremendous an entire childhood can be. It’s the parents and Elders were not true to their children and thus impacts the life of our protagonist.\r\nHolden’s father is also blinded by money and his status as a corporate lawyer. This puts barriers up between him and his son. These barriers are like lying to Holden, causing him trauma as he tries to f ind his place in society. Just as Jonas is the protagonist and vote counter, Holden is also the narrator and protagonist of Catcher in the Rye. The impact of the stories theme and character relationships in both stories can be felt on a deeper level when we experience the story solely through the protagonist’s eye. Another contrasting element between the protagonists for S.\r\nE. Hinton and J. D. Salinger is how the characters are introduced to the story. It is very clear that Holden is struggling with life. He is 16 years-old with partially gray hair, thin, and out of shape. He smokes cigarettes as well. Jonas, on the other hand, is raised in this Eden-like settlement where everyone moves through life free of stress and ailments. Furthermore, Holden is an irate teen who is very confused and depressed. He also displays characteristics of bigotry which contrasts Jonas’s lifestyle of equality.\r\nHolton, however, is an evil soulfulness but he can be amiable and even thoughtful which matches the characteristic expectations of the children in The Giver. In fact, almost every person had similar somatic features as can be seen in the future(a) citation: Almost every citizen in the community had dark eyes. His parents did, and Lily did, and so did all of his group members and friends (p. 20). Yet a distinction is drawn in Jonas as the author followed the above citation with this: But on that point are a few exceptions: Jonas, himself, and a young-bearing(prenominal) Five who he had noticed the different, lighter eyes.\r\nThus, we are given hints of Jonas’s differences. This contrasts the obvious struggles that are in Holton’s persona. As I looked collectively at the comparisons and contrasting differences between The Giver and the two other novels, I found the likenesses to be more apparent than the differences. Each of the novels under study all had a theme of isolationism. On top of this, the protagonists and most of the peasan t characters in all the novels were children and young adults who struggled with loss, depression, conflict, and illness.\r\nEach story brought the reality of separation and isolationism to light as the youth banded together to overcome obstacles. The stories display how great an impact deceit, control, and lack of compassion can have on individuals growing into adulthood. People can come together down and sink into isolation. The burden of all this can either lead people away from quest their dreamsâ€sometimes destroying themselves into a pit of isolation. The strong-willed, however, find a way to learn from these challenging situations and discover ways to help themselves so that they, in turn, can help friends and loved ones.\r\n'